D. Sedin trade?

[penguins]

D. Sedin, M. Ryder, J. Hedberg

or:

P. Sharp, B. Elliot, D. Backes, R. Callahan

The thought of trading Sedin is terrifying, but what do you think?

[penguins]

I fully expect you guys to rip me apart on this one so don't hold back....

[john29]

I hate giving away Sedin even though I like Sharp and Backes (position eligibility is a plus for both). Backes will play tomorrow so the injury should not be an issue. Not real familiar with the scoring format, only 2 goalie categories even though they are worth more in total points. Just curious, who would you drop?

[NightParade]

There's a saying that in any legitimate trade the winner is whoever gets the best player. Keep Daniel.

[penguins]

Position eligibility is definitely the major selling point. Im struggling pretty bad on the RW and could use the double and triple eligibility. Im leaning pretty heavily towards declining, but if I was to take it I would drop Ryder or Alfredsson, probably Alfredsson...

[mbr311]

You don't have hits, blocks or ATOI as scoring categories so Callahan isn't nearly as valuable in your format as mine. You are giving up the better goalie in my opinion (and I know some will disagree). You are also giving up Sedin who as everyone said is the best player in this trade. Only you know where you need to improve though. Those are just some observations on my end. I like Sharp a lot I think he is very valuable and a lot of people think Backes is due for a break out season. Elliott could grab the starting role in STL as well which would make him more valuable than Hedberg (as is assuming they are both backups I rank Hedberg higher than Elliot personally.

[bassguitarxplyr]

Keep Sedin. The players you receive are no guarantees, but Daniel is. Also, Johan Hedberg is pretty damn good right now, so it's a break-even to trade him with Elltion IMO